Linked by Kroc Camen on Sat 26th Jun 2010 10:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 431702
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
It's only 2 years old if you count SP3 and 6 years old if SP2 (a major rework). It works very well and upgrade is not an option for many reasons. Sorry, XP is here to stay.
The problem is IE6, which is still hugely popular in some countries or organizations and its quirks are still shaping the web. I hoped IE9 would nudge at least some of IE6 users to use a standard compliant browser. Apparently that wasn't the goal for Microsoft (not really a surprise, why to fight a won war if there are challenges elsewhere).