Linked by David Adams on Wed 7th Jul 2010 19:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 432888
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anyone who ever used version 1.0 will know what I mean (the infamous unknown error has occurred).
LOL version 1.0? When did that come out? Try paint.net or the Zune software for a better assessment.
The might decide tomorrow that they're new XYZ is better and make everyone use that with an interpreter in between for Legacybsruff.
Half the point of .Net is to keep it independent of any changes in Windows. You can also run .Net apps in Windows with Mono so there is really no cause for concern.
MS uses .Net to keep developers on their platform which in turn keeps consumers and businesses buying Windows. It's laughable to suggest that they might move away from it anytime soon given its success. If anything they will ditch Win32 but that would be far into the future.





Member since:
2010-04-14
Microsoft had done stranger things than killing .NET... I still personally won't use it. I don't care if it's faster, it's not portable enough (different versions of the tinting on different windows platforms) and overall it's a bit buggy sometimes. Anyone who ever used version 1.0 will know what I mean (the infamous unknown error has occurred). The might decide tomorrow that they're new XYZ is better and make everyone use that with an interpreter in between for
Legacybsruff.