Linked by David Adams on Sun 11th Jul 2010 19:43 UTC
Microsoft U.K. government staff suggested replacing Microsoft Corp. operating systems on computers with free alternatives in response to a call for ideas for Prime Minister David Cameron's cost-cutting drive.
Thread beginning with comment 433294
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Not likely
by kaiwai on Mon 12th Jul 2010 22:22 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Not likely"
Member since:

What's happening at our organisation is they've frozen non-essential upgrades.
So users who are running Office 2003 on XP will not be upgraded to Office 2007+ and/or Win7 unless their job critically depends upon it.

This has a three-fold effect:
* it reduces costs in having to buy new licences for newer software,
* reduces the need for hardware upgrades (to keep up with the increasing footprints of newer software)
* and reduces the need for training (as few people are upgrading and those who do, are more less likely to need new training as they've specifically requested for the upgrade)

Unfortunately there are idiots who run businesses who don't see software and hardware investment in the same way they see investing in smoozing with customers, sales rep cars etc. as being critical. It is truly amazing how in an organisation the productivity drops like a stone but they'll focus on upgrading everything else in the organisation except for the software and hardware. It is time for business owners to wake up and actually realise that just because the customer can't see it doesn't mean that such investments are useless - the investment is but one component in a larger machinery and understanding how a minor change can bring improvements in productivity is paramount to ensuring that your company stays on the cutting edge of competitiveness.

Reply Parent Score: 3