Linked by David Adams on Fri 16th Jul 2010 19:44 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 433738
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
OpenSolaris is licensed under the CDDL, not GPLv3
http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/sun-to-release-opensolar...
Still, gplv3 is delightfully linux-kernel-incompatible, so it doesn't make any difference.
"OpenSolaris is licensed under the CDDL, not GPLv3
http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/sun-to-release-opensolar...
Still, gplv3 is delightfully linux-kernel-incompatible, so it doesn't make any difference. "
Do you have another source? The one you link to are based on an article from the same guy as this 'RIP Open Solaris' article.
http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/sun-to-release-opensolar...
Still, gplv3 is delightfully linux-kernel-incompatible, so it doesn't make any difference.
Still, gplv3 is delightfully linux-kernel-incompatible, so it doesn't make any difference.
And if they went for something that was compatible with the Linux kernel it wouldn't have made a lick of difference. The two operating system are so different in nature any cross pollination would be non existent. People here have this deluded idea that some how that if OpenSolaris kernel was at least GPL then there would be this great code sharing fest between the two projects - you find that people who make such declarations have never written a line of code in their life any more complicated than a 'hello world'.





Member since:
2009-11-26
OpenSolaris is licensed under the CDDL, not GPLv3