Linked by David Adams on Fri 16th Jul 2010 19:44 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 433865
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yeah, he was lying about Windows, whatever he said. Windows is a even less secure than he says it is.
He claimed that Vista had no security improvements over XP.
I think his entire opinion of Vista was based on screenshots and hearsay.
Not that I ever got that upset with him. He's just another tech tabloid writer that cares more about pageviews than anything else.




Member since:
2010-05-06
Yeah, he was lying about Windows, whatever he said. Windows is a even less secure than he says it is.
On the other hand, even a broken clock is right two times a day. Maybe he was right about that.
Edited 2010-07-17 15:52 UTC