Linked by Brynet on Thu 15th Jul 2010 16:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 433952
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ArchLinux sucked balls the only time I tried it. Waay overhyped POS. Atleast at that date.
Archlinux is nice. But it lost the KISS distribution personality when it got infested by users who want less package dependencies at the expense of broken dependencies for example when the 'optdependency' thing was introduced.
run ldd on your /usr/bin and /usr/lib/ and you'll find broken binary dependencies which can be fixed by installed 'optdependencies'. This breaks KISS philosophy because it doesn't confirm with how upstream designs applications.





Member since:
2007-03-26
You are so wrong. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.
You can fork OpenSolaris. I've already stated this.
Did you just completely ignore my post?
Your GPL hate
Grow up.
I don't hate GPL. Quite the opposite in fact - 90% computers I manage run Linux as the main OS and ArchLinux is my primary desktop OS. I just don't believe that GPL the only licence worth considering. In fact I that kind of attitude is little different to OS fanboyism.
So if I come across as a GPL hater, then that's only because you're so blinkered to other opinions outside of GPL.
Edited 2010-07-18 21:11 UTC