Linked by gsyoungblood on Tue 20th Jul 2010 18:01 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless On July 15th the latest Android super-phone was released by Motorola and Verizon Wireless. All hail the Droid X. The release was not without controversy though. The Droid X, while greatly raising the bar for Android phones in general, does so at the expense of the very power users and community that made the original Droid the gotta-have phone it became. Alienating this group may have far reaching consequences for Motorola.
Thread beginning with comment 434203
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
LighthouseJ
Member since:
2009-06-18

Voted you up because the consumer should be able to vote with their wallet.

In the article, I immediately felt some prejudice against Motorola starting from the headline, and continued throughout, explaining how the protective measures are a disadvantage in some fictitious way or another.

Don't like it? Don't buy it. And if you're going to write about, be constructive about the information. Don't spend all that time gathering facts just to poo poo on it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

sc3252 Member since:
2005-09-06

Its more complicated then that. The consumers probably don't understand what this means for them. I don't think if you told someone this was put in place for planned obsolescence they(the consumer) would be happy, but that is what its for. They don't want to support this thing for more than a year so people will go out and buy the Droid Y(as in why would you buy this?) next year.

Reply Parent Score: 3

LighthouseJ Member since:
2009-06-18

Are you sure the consumer wouldn't be happy if they heard about planned obsolescence?

A (regular) consumer only wants a phone that will last them until their next upgrade cycle. Would the consumer really care if their phone they upgraded from broke after they upgraded? Why should Motorola over-engineer a phone that will last 15 years when it'll be used heavily for 2?

Further, most people (at least the ones I know) don't upgrade phones out of cycle and pay $400 to do so, they wait until their carrier heavily subsidizes their new one on a contract renewal period. If the phone breaks beforehand and must buy a new one, they'll buy the cheapest one so they can still use the service (and be soured on the carrier that charges them money), not the Droid Y.

Reply Parent Score: 1