Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Jul 2010 17:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 434526
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
Perhaps the biggest implication of this decision is that it is now legal to sell, publish and advertise tools for jailbreaking and software that incorporates some jailbreaking techniques in order to install itself on the restricted device. Now it is even legal to operate third-party application stores for jail-broken devices.
With some serious money behind we can expect jailbreaking to be quite effective. Of course manufacturers of such restricted devices will fight back piling technical limitations. In a longer term, however, such practices will only piss off the users and make themselves less competitive.