To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You said:
you have to wait ~2 months for that patch to land in CentOS
and I said that's a gross exaggeration.
Maybe you don't know about Caitlyn Martin but she/he has brought this issue up numerous times without specifying any examples other than a late Firefox patch.
http://ever-increasing-entropy.blogspot.com/2009/08/end-of-centos-n...
I said it because it's a fact. That Caitlyn Martin is exaggerating a little bit. But CentOS is really not good for mission critical stuff in big enterprise (it is crazy to go without support there) but it is enough for home server, development servers, hosting providers, and such. That is a fact. Why you have problem with that?
Maybe because you want to push CentOS everywhere, and don't want anyone to buy RHEL? Growing and profitable Red Hat sh1ts all over your "open source can't make money" agenda, so I understand your buthurtness.
PS: Oh, and I wouldn't recommend Oracle Unworkable Linux even to an enemy. Oracle support is worse than useless, any money thrown in their direction is wasted. Better go with CentOS than OEL.





Member since:
2010-05-06
Dude what are you smoking? Did you even read my post? You attacked me for something that someone else said? Because someone else's vendetta against centos? Really? I didn't read what that Caitlyn Martin said. Have a link?
I don't have a problem with CentOS security, I wouldn't be using it otherwise. I already said that lagging 40-60 days behind RHEL is not a big deal. You would know if you read the post.
If you want a flamewar, find somebody else.