Linked by David Adams on Tue 27th Jul 2010 07:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 434650
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-07-28
I find it reasonably unlikely the "Mac" line will stray away from Intel in the foreseeable future. OSX would require complete re-work, not to mention the 3rd party applications. There are two types of mac user: Casual home user / dont wanna mess with it -- And the hardcore multimedia stead fasters who never went to PC, and that end of them would be boned by going to ARM.. ARM is a respectable enough CPU, however even if you did ramp the speed up to 3ghz and add 16 cores, its still not going to run with a modern Intel in the multimedia rendering arena, nor gaming for that matter. Then there is the momentum Apple has gained with their Mac line in the recent years, that would basically vaporize.. Software companies dont like total arch changes, and are slow enough to adopt an x86 mac variant, much less anything else.. So they may as well just stop making computers and go exclusively gadgets before they switched the Mac to a non x86 CPU. As to them using AMD, seeing as how AMD is second place and considered "economy" in most circles, the elitist attitude of Apple would seem to be at odds with using something thats a known #2, they are FAR to self obsessed for that.