Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Jul 2010 17:44 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Thread beginning with comment 434754
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yea, but full 3.3 support is many years away, full 4.1 is probably 5 years away.
Once 3.0 is completed in Mesa, I wouldn't be surprised if it could get to 3.3 in six months. 4.1 within a year or two (it requires graphics cards which barely exist right now, anyway). 2.x -> 3.0 is by far the largest hurdle.
"Yea, but full 3.3 support is many years away, full 4.1 is probably 5 years away.
Cause you couldn't use official binaries from Nvidia or AMD. Nope! Can't do that! "
Well, you can't use official binary Linux drivers from Nvidia or AMD to get support for OpenGL 4.1, if that is what you mean.
Edited 2010-07-30 10:16 UTC
RE[3]: 3.0 or 3.3?
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Fri 30th Jul 2010 15:35
in reply to "RE[2]: 3.0 or 3.3?"
A little less than five years
http://developer.nvidia.com/object/opengl_driver.html
Edited 2010-07-31 19:54 UTC





Member since:
2006-06-12
Yea, but full 3.3 support is many years away, full 4.1 is probably 5 years away.