Linked by David Adams on Tue 27th Jul 2010 07:35 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 434802
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Shooting yourself in the foot.
by lemur2 on Fri 30th Jul 2010 10:05
in reply to "RE[5]: Shooting yourself in the foot."
Next, Harding spells out issues with video streaming — namely, the fact that HTML5 doesn’t really have anything that matches Flash when it comes to dynamically adjusting quality control and buffering.
HTML5 itself doesn't have a two-way communication for dynamically adjusting buffering, but that doesn't mean that it cannot be done:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/beta/features/
Web Sockets
Developers will be able to build real-time online interactions like gaming and chatting.
... and interactions like communication between the server and the player for dynamically adjusting quality control and buffering for VP8 video playback.
Edited 2010-07-30 10:07 UTC




Member since:
2009-08-26
http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/youtube-weighs-in-on-flash-vs-html...
Enjoy!