Linked by David Adams on Tue 27th Jul 2010 07:35 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 434814
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-17
I've used mostly windows. IMO, because it was the earliest target, experienced windows users are more aware of potential danger. it's like growing up in a war zone
so i agree with you, in that if a user wants to feel carefree while "computing", os x seems the best among reasonably common oses. a common distro like -buntu is probably almost as good.
unfortunately none of these (os x, -buntu, windows) seem by default to resist the secondary level of attacks (on privacy).