Linked by David Adams on Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:05 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 434909
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
True, which undermines Ballmers 'ecosystem' argument as to why Windows 7 is the bee's knee's when it comes to slate operating systems. I'd sooner Microsoft create a whole new ecosystem off Silverlight than kluge the crappy win32 from platform to platform with all its ugly bugginess. Microsoft needs to realise that Windows 7 isn't the solution to all of life's problems; it is a great operating system but sometimes you need to realise that an existing tool won't solve the problem.
Silverlight is a great framework and what native API they do provide with Windows CE 7 (which sits below Windows Phone 7) should be narrow in scope, robust and simple to use. Force developers to use the higher level frameworks - these are slates, not full blown computers so there is no way one can justify the need for access to low level hardware on such a configuration from an app developers stand point.