Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux As we mentioned in a previous article, Red Hat advocate Greg DeKoenigsberg claimed that due to the much larger amount of code it's contributed, Red Hat is a better open source citizen than Canonical, adding, "Canonical is a marketing organization masquerading as an engineering organization." A Computerworld blog retorts that that's no insult; and that marketing Linux could be just as important to the cause as contributing code. Updated
Thread beginning with comment 435238
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Ubuntu
by vivainio on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 20:26 UTC in reply to "RE: Ubuntu"
vivainio
Member since:
2008-12-26

They also develop a decent development platform in Launchpad, but very little of the software you think is improving things is written by Red Hat.


I think what makes the difference is that Ubuntu is just tested better. No matter who does all the development, if a component is broken when it's time to push out the release, your distro doesn't benefit from it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Ubuntu
by Lunitik on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 20:42 in reply to "RE[2]: Ubuntu"
Lunitik Member since:
2005-08-07

Actually, Ubuntu offers some of the smallest numbers of testers around. Less than 10% of their users are running the development releases, so its really difficult to make that argument.

Where the real testing comes from is that Ubuntu are generally at least 6 months behind Fedora, and Fedora users are actually giving worthwhile feedback to fix things.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Ubuntu
by vivainio on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 20:45 in reply to "RE[3]: Ubuntu"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26


Where the real testing comes from is that Ubuntu are generally at least 6 months behind Fedora, and Fedora users are actually giving worthwhile feedback to fix things.


Ok, let me rephrase - Ubuntu releases are better tested than other distros.

Reply Parent Score: 1