Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux As we mentioned in a previous article, Red Hat advocate Greg DeKoenigsberg claimed that due to the much larger amount of code it's contributed, Red Hat is a better open source citizen than Canonical, adding, "Canonical is a marketing organization masquerading as an engineering organization." A Computerworld blog retorts that that's no insult; and that marketing Linux could be just as important to the cause as contributing code. Updated
Thread beginning with comment 435305
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What marketing?
by fredb1974 on Wed 4th Aug 2010 06:38 UTC in reply to "RE: What marketing?"
Member since:

It could help a little.

At the RMLL 2010 in Bordeaux (France), I heard that Ubuntu-Fr doesn't get money from Canonical at all...

Reply Parent Score: 1