Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 435333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-27
So users have no value if they don't know what they're doing, then? Microsofts accounting department would disagree with this.
Think of the developers that could be hired with a tenth of Microsofts revenue from Windows? Of course that would require a user-oriented mentality to create something users would want to actually pay for in the first place.
Chicken and egg problem. This kind of viewpoint hinders Linux's acceptance. Canonical's more "user" oriented approach advances Linux's acceptance (which btw, also helps Red Hat).
Microsofts sales of Windows to normal "users" dwarfs Red Hats pathetic (relatively speaking, of course) revenue. Something to think about before jumping on the non-developer-users-don't-matter bandwagon.