Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Aug 2010 10:47 UTC
Humor Now that I'm done with my internship and ready to take on OSNews again, I figured it'd be nice to start off with something light-hearted. I just read that Google bought an unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with a camera, ready to photograph whatever it flies across. We may consider Google's biggest threat to be privacy, but with all this computing power they have, their Street View cars, and now, unmanned flying drones, they look more and more like SkyNet to me. So, what's your most likely apocalyptic scenario?
Thread beginning with comment 435916
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

First, I'd scour for a long, blunt weapon, heavy enough to cause a big kinetic impact and thus smack the zombie back a bit, but not too heavy for me to wield well. No knives or swords or such as they just do flesh-wounds and minimal kinetic impact, and as we all know, zombies don't really care about wounds. It's better to be able to keep them at a distance than to be able slice them and get eaten.

That is a mace.

But what do we use as munition, A friend knows somebody who said he once saw a bullet, but I don't know if that's true

Some other candidates (technology supportable after breakdown of civilization) for one's anti-zombie arsenal:


Who needs munition?

Edited 2010-08-09 13:10 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

futurefarmer Member since:

Don't forget the Aztec weapon, the fearsome atlatl:"

Reply Parent Score: 1