Linked by David Adams on Mon 9th Aug 2010 15:34 UTC, submitted by suka
Thread beginning with comment 436066
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: The real question is
by Manish on Wed 11th Aug 2010 16:48
in reply to "RE[6]: The real question is"
Damn, no interoperability of Ubuntu Server with "Linux distributions" (apparently Ubuntu is no Linux distribution according to its website ;-)).
Wow! I never knew that you need to claim that your server OS is based on Linux for everyone to know that it is based on Linux. People who care to know, already know and people who don't care won't ever bother to find out the base of any OS.




Member since:
2010-02-16
Wow, you really do have a distorted view of reality.
Here are some facts:
Red Hat's main focus is *not* servers. Red Hat's focus is corporate environments which includes corporate desktops and corporate servers alike (which is why the RHEL website already linked has three navigation tabs: Overview, Server, Desktop). See also http://www.redhat.com/rhel/desktop/
If Red Hat wasn't interested in desktops at all, why is Red Hat the top GNOME contributor? Red Hat even employs four KDE developers (Canonical only two).
Even the Ubuntu Server page does not mention Linux:
"Ubuntu Server mixes effortlessly with Ubuntu, Windows or Mac OS environments."
http://www.ubuntu.com/server
Damn, no interoperability of Ubuntu Server with "Linux distributions" (apparently Ubuntu is no Linux distribution according to its website ;-)).
Edited 2010-08-10 10:45 UTC