Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Aug 2010 19:14 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Thread beginning with comment 436338
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Is it bad? Not really.
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Thu 12th Aug 2010 03:32
in reply to "RE: Is it bad? Not really."
Linux really doen't have anything that matches OpenSolaris ZFS in ease of use and features.
Nothing that is production ready. Wait a year and BTRFS will be here. If you are looking to the future with your data storage needs, BTRFS is a really good reason to *not* go to ZFS, unless you are already running Solaris everywhere.
RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really.
by tyrione on Thu 12th Aug 2010 04:25
in reply to "RE[2]: Is it bad? Not really."
"Linux really doen't have anything that matches OpenSolaris ZFS in ease of use and features.
Nothing that is production ready. Wait a year and BTRFS will be here. If you are looking to the future with your data storage needs, BTRFS is a really good reason to *not* go to ZFS, unless you are already running Solaris everywhere. "
Who makes BTRFS? Oracle.
RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really.
by phoenix on Thu 12th Aug 2010 05:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Is it bad? Not really."
"Linux really doen't have anything that matches OpenSolaris ZFS in ease of use and features.
Nothing that is production ready. Wait a year and BTRFS will be here. If you are looking to the future with your data storage needs, BTRFS is a really good reason to *not* go to ZFS, unless you are already running Solaris everywhere. "
Btrfs is at least 5 years off from being a replacement for ZFS as it stands today. Btrfs is not anywhere near the same league as ZFS right now. It's absolutely hilarious when people try to suggest "some future version of" Btrfs as a viable alternative for ZFS of today.
RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really.
by spanglywires on Thu 12th Aug 2010 07:43
in reply to "RE[2]: Is it bad? Not really."
"Linux really doen't have anything that matches OpenSolaris ZFS in ease of use and features.
Nothing that is production ready. Wait a year and BTRFS will be here. If you are looking to the future with your data storage needs, BTRFS is a really good reason to *not* go to ZFS, unless you are already running Solaris everywhere. "
You do know btrfs is *only* a filesystem right?
ZFS is a rampant layering violation
ZFS is more than just an fs, its a volume manager too. How are you going to RAID your btrfs? Through mdadm? Theres a good reason not to use Linux in the enterprise straight away.
RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really.
by Luminair on Thu 12th Aug 2010 17:20
in reply to "RE[2]: Is it bad? Not really."





Member since:
2005-07-06
I would say the advantage not covered is the combination of Linux and Solaris, is that OpenSolaris had a free stable production quality ZFS implementation.
Linux really doen't have anything that matches OpenSolaris ZFS in ease of use and features.