Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Aug 2010 19:14 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Thread beginning with comment 436353
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Is it bad? Not really.
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Thu 12th Aug 2010 13:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really."
While the project was started by Oracle, the code is GPL and already merged int the mainline kernel. Josef Bacik of Red hat is one of the fulltime developers ( along with two others from oracle ). There is widespread plans for adoption from many distros. While an outright Oracle drop of the project would delay it, I doubt they would be able to stop it.
RE[4]: Is it bad? Not really.
by segedunum on Fri 13th Aug 2010 17:18
in reply to "RE[3]: Is it bad? Not really."




Member since:
2005-11-21
Nothing that is production ready. Wait a year and BTRFS will be here. If you are looking to the future with your data storage needs, BTRFS is a really good reason to *not* go to ZFS, unless you are already running Solaris everywhere. "
Who makes BTRFS? Oracle.