Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Aug 2010 19:14 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Thread beginning with comment 436418
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not surprised...
by nt_jerkface on Thu 12th Aug 2010 21:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Not surprised..."
The benefits of Oracle over free databases are the features, support and experience Oracle has in the industry. They can debug from app server to DB what you need and offer solutions including patches.
Let's also not forget transactions per second. Oracle will just plain outperform MySql.
How many companies actually need Oracle is a valid question but enough of them don't mind paying for what is perceived to be the best when it comes to performance and reliability. For a big Fortune 500 corp a 100k check to Oracle is pocket change.




Member since:
2005-08-27
I like your well thought out post. Oracle can't do much about the low cost or free solutions. Those will always exist and Oracle may not want to stick their necks out there to try and offer free solutions for which it can't monetize. They do quite fine with enterprise solutions and the support from them.
The benefits of Oracle over free databases are the features, support and experience Oracle has in the industry. They can debug from app server to DB what you need and offer solutions including patches.
What they have to offer on the hardware and OS side is exactly the same:
The benefit of Solaris over free OS are the features, support and and experience Oracle has over the industry. They can debug from hardware to kernel what you need and offer solutions including patches.
That kind of support is one that they don't have to guess at. And I've received many OS related patches from Sun in the past for specific problems that were not even announced until they became GA.