To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Educate yourself. This case has barely ANYTHING in common with the MS suit. It's pretty simple stuff, actually.
http://www.osnews.com/story/23682/Details_from_Oracle_s_Complaint_A...
I did educate myself. The only difference in the case is that Sun sued for breach of contract and Oracle is directly suing for Patent violation. But the reasoning is the same:
Fragmenting the Java platform;
Flooding the market with incompatible Java Runtime Environments;
Forcing other companies to distribute or use products that are incompatible with Java;
Significantly limiting Sun's distribution channels for the Java Runtime Environment;
Intentionally interfering with the development of Java-based applications for compatible runtimes;
Copyright infringement resulting from Microsoft's distribution of an unlicensed implementation of the Java Runtime Environment;
Intentional creation of incompatibilities between Microsoft software and competing technologies, thereby raising switching costs for consumers and reducing consumer choice.
Basically MS did the same thing as Google did. Microsoft did it after licensing Java. Google just straight up did it. LOL!
I am sure if this makes it to court (Which I doubt will happen) Oracle will pull this out!
Ok, I'm trying to figure out what the lawsuit is about.
According to the article you linked, Google took "bits and pieces" of Java, threw in their own stuff, and stuck the "Java"-label on it. In my opinion, this does violate some laws.
For example: When I take a Sony TV, and a I start replacing some parts which other parts I have lying around in my basement. Then, I start selling these TV's in stores as "Sony" TV's... I think this does violate copyright laws, and could even be considered forgery in some countries...





Member since:
2005-11-10
That Sun sued MS for almost the same thing and won big time. Oracle might be wrong in a lot off peoples eyes on this, legally they got pretty good feet to stand on!