Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Aug 2010 22:58 UTC, submitted by Alex Forster
Thread beginning with comment 436751
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I wonder if this actually means that now is less risk to develop an .NET clone than an Java clone..
Nope, the patents might just as well apply to CLR as well - optimized initialization of objects, JIT mechanisms, preloading, OO security framework.
CLR isn't _that_ different that implementations are automatically safe.
The difference between .NET and Android might be that Microsoft paid Sun (as part of their 1.6b$ payment due to the lawsuit, or separately) to license all these patents. That still doesn't extend to other CLR implementations (at least that would be a very unusual licensing deal)




Member since:
2005-06-29
I wonder if this actually means that now is less risk to develop an .NET clone than an Java clone... that pretty much turns the table of a lot of old discussions...
Sad, sad patentable world...