Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Oct 2005 20:33 UTC, submitted by dadexter
BSD and Darwin derivatives "Overall - DesktopBSD is a pleasure to run and a breeze to install. It is an excellent choice for a new BSD user, a not terribly sophisticated computer user, or an old salt who just wants a good, solid, reliable desktop that won't take days to install and weeks to configure and just wants to get on with it."
Thread beginning with comment 43681
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: installer?
by Joe User on Wed 12th Oct 2005 01:13 UTC in reply to "installer?"
Joe User
Member since:
2005-06-29

I find it odd they used the old installer approach. They could've easily gone with a livecd containing an installer app that the user runs (e.g. like knoppix), which is much more elegant, IMO.

LiveCDs are fine to demo a product at a friend's house, but for daily tasks you don't want to run a LiveCD, you want the full speed of your Raid-0 array of 2x 15,000 rpm HDD's ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: installer?
by on Wed 12th Oct 2005 01:39 in reply to "RE: installer?"
Member since:

Yes, but what I'm talking about is a combination live cd/installer. It's a normal live cd, but it includes an installer app if you want to install it to your hard drive.

-bytecoder

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: installer?
by hobgoblin on Wed 12th Oct 2005 11:18 in reply to "RE: installer?"
hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

i think the poster had in mind a livecd that have a app on it that work very much like a normal installer. start it up and you can use it to partition the hardrive, set up users and programs, and then run the install.

allso, livecds make for excelent rescue cds as you have a whole os to use. not just some bare bones with a stack of scripts to fix common flaws.

Reply Parent Score: 1