Linked by David Adams on Mon 9th Aug 2010 15:34 UTC, submitted by suka
Gnome Ubuntu's community manager Jono Bacon talks in an interview with derStandard.at about the relationship between Ubuntu and GNOME, GNOME Shell, Unity and why the netbook market is that important to Canonical.
Thread beginning with comment 436813
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Manish
Member since:
2009-12-18

Things aside, read the guy's comment on which I commented. He was acting as if applying patches was wrong. Modifying code was wrong.

Nowhere in my comment did I say that Ubuntu/Canonical should *NOT* submit patches upstream. I was just replying to his comment statement "Not only are they pissing off upstream projects by applying patches"

Please don't come to your own cooked up conclusion about anyone from a comment.

Reply Parent Score: 1

abraxas Member since:
2005-07-07

Things aside, read the guy's comment on which I commented. He was acting as if applying patches was wrong. Modifying code was wrong.

Nowhere in my comment did I say that Ubuntu/Canonical should *NOT* submit patches upstream. I was just replying to his comment statement "Not only are they pissing off upstream projects by applying patches"

Please don't come to your own cooked up conclusion about anyone from a comment.


Maybe you should read the whole thread to understand the context. He wasn't implying that applying any patches or modifiying code in general was a bad thing. You are the one who came up with an invalid conclusion from a comment because you didn't read and/or understand the entire thread.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Manish Member since:
2009-12-18

Maybe you should read the whole thread to understand the context. He wasn't implying that applying any patches or modifiying code in general was a bad thing. You are the one who came up with an invalid conclusion from a comment because you didn't read and/or understand the entire thread.


I have read the whole thread. I was just replying to a comment and not to the whole thread. I did not come to an invalid conclusion. His points were pretty straight forwards and didn't required any special pre-requisites for understanding. Or he needs to put forward his point properly.

BTW I did read and understand the whole thread. I am not obliged to answer to the OP. I just replied to one comment when I saw that the guy has written just anything which came to his mind. Or probably he didn't write what he wanted.

KTHXBYE

Reply Parent Score: 1