Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 15th Aug 2010 20:28 UTC
Internet & Networking Lots of talk on net neutrality this week, mostly due to the joint policy proposal from Google and Verzion. While many Americans are calling for government-imposed net neutrality rules, The New York Times' Eric Pfanner proposes a different solution - one that has been working wonders in Europe. And hey, what a coincidence - I'm European!
Thread beginning with comment 436938
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Sun 15th Aug 2010 23:36 UTC
Member since:

the US is full of oligarchies. yes competition works really well. but only if there is competition. baby bell vs baby bell doesn't count.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Sun 15th Aug 2010 23:39 in reply to "Comment by Luminair"
Luminair Member since:

gm vs ford and lockheed martin vs boeing hardly counts too. you see for yourself the manifestation of real competition in those situations: tesla spurred gm's organizational shift toward the volt, and spacex spurred boeing's cst-100. in order for competition to work, up-and-comers (disruptive competiters) must be allowed to exist, must be encouraged to exist, and indeed must exist.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Comment by Luminair
by ezylstra on Mon 16th Aug 2010 14:50 in reply to "Comment by Luminair"
ezylstra Member since:

Baby Bell vs Baby Bell only exists when one wants to acquire the other. They all have monopolies in the areas they operate.

Reply Parent Score: 1