Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Aug 2010 06:41 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless I've seen it so many times in the movies and TV: a person wakes up in this futuristic world, walks by his kitchen, and a computerized voice is telling him that someone is calling him. But instead of picking up a receiver, the call is actually a video-call, and his TV is used for the conversation. If you put 2 and 2 together, this is not really that futuristic. Having a camera attached on your TV, and a VoIP SIP or Skype connection with it, is not mad science. So why don't we already have this on our TVs?
Thread beginning with comment 436987
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't have a TV
by error32 on Mon 16th Aug 2010 08:43 UTC
Member since:

But I use QQ to do the video chatting thing with my girlfriend in China. I could not care less about talking to other people using video, so the one proprietary client is no problem for me.
I think most people are still happy using voice only because it means they don't have to care about what the other party sees. I for one would not want to take a video call when I am just out of bed...

Reply Score: 1

RE: I don't have a TV
by _xmv on Mon 16th Aug 2010 08:46 in reply to "I don't have a TV"
_xmv Member since:

what we just need is the option to be there
since theres no real standard, we don't really have the option - it only works with same phone etc.. actually skype is probably one of the app that works on most platforms

i use video sometimes, it can be useful to troubleshoot issues or just to show something.. thats like 5% of my coms, mind you, i wouldn't want more than that, but it's nice when it's there

Reply Parent Score: 1