Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Aug 2010 06:41 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless I've seen it so many times in the movies and TV: a person wakes up in this futuristic world, walks by his kitchen, and a computerized voice is telling him that someone is calling him. But instead of picking up a receiver, the call is actually a video-call, and his TV is used for the conversation. If you put 2 and 2 together, this is not really that futuristic. Having a camera attached on your TV, and a VoIP SIP or Skype connection with it, is not mad science. So why don't we already have this on our TVs?
Thread beginning with comment 437041
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
SpeechManiac
Member since:
2008-03-27

I my opinion it's not the technology that makes video-conferencing so "Jetson"esque (does anybody remember The Jetsons?) and hence futuristic, it's the fact that (in the movies at least) that feature is consumed as if it were breakfast cereal.

I tried video conferencing myself and found it rather annoying, since I'm limited to do "only" talking. When on the phone I can talk (of course), read/write an email, look at the stock ticker, etc... I know, all bad habits. But: Even if I don't have to, I can if I choose to...

best regards.

Reply Score: 1