Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Aug 2010 06:41 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless I've seen it so many times in the movies and TV: a person wakes up in this futuristic world, walks by his kitchen, and a computerized voice is telling him that someone is calling him. But instead of picking up a receiver, the call is actually a video-call, and his TV is used for the conversation. If you put 2 and 2 together, this is not really that futuristic. Having a camera attached on your TV, and a VoIP SIP or Skype connection with it, is not mad science. So why don't we already have this on our TVs?
Thread beginning with comment 437088
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Reading all this...
by phoenix on Mon 16th Aug 2010 19:38 UTC in reply to "Reading all this..."
Member since:

What happens if you and a bunch of friends are sitting down to watch a movie, and you get a call? Do you really want to disrupt the entire movie, and have the entire group of people watch your call?

Putting this is a TV makes no sense. TVs are meant to be used by groups of people. Phone calls are (usually) meant to be between two people. Video chat on a cell phone, tablet, palmtop, computer, etc makes a lot more sense.

That, and TVs should remain nothing more than video displays. The fewer builtins, the better.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Reading all this...
by Driht on Mon 16th Aug 2010 19:50 in reply to "RE: Reading all this..."
Driht Member since:

Even worse: football.

People would kill you for that.

Reply Parent Score: 2