To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree but http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207576021
Why not kaspersky then? Kaspersky already has the technology.
Mcafee is not so good after all, it is a mediocre antivirus.
But as far as I read in the news, they do more research than Karspersky and find more flaw/viruses. Just as Norten, they are so targetted by malware that it render the product useless. This would not happen if it was hardware. I am not saying it is a good AV, but it is not a mediocre firm.
The way I see it, McAfee's garbage doesn't belong anywhere on my machine. If I really felt I needed virus protection, I still wouldn't use theirs--I'd rather use Microsoft's own Security Essentials (which was mentioned in the article). It's the most decent program I've found, and free, no nags... and it won't leave you screwed and in danger after the X-year "subscription."
Not everyone is a dumbass needing "protection" (if you can even call it that; more like a false sense of security) from viruses, so if it's in the hardware, it should be PURELY optional. As in, not even built into the hardware by default, with a "special" version of the chip for those idiots that think they need it and want to waste the extra money.
People need common sense and self control. Not f***ing anti-virus software. It's cheaper (free) and far more secure.
Edited 2010-08-19 22:47 UTC
In all fairness, Intel could work wonders with McAfee's software base and make it run a LOT more efficiently, which I'm assuming they will do. Not only that, they might be able to take some of the ideas from the inner workings and help make their chips more "virus proof" or at least help localize the potential damage (like the virtualization instructions).
I wish Intel had bought Sun instead of Oracle. A MUCH better idea in the long run that McAfee, but there is still a lot of good that can come from this acquisition.




Member since:
2008-12-26
Now we will have resource hogging junk running at the hardware level too.
That's where it would belong in a sane world.
Think of this - where do you think most of the computer time is spent these days?
Compiling? Rendering?
For a corporate Windows desktop, virus scanning is a huge resource drain. Imagine if Intel had a hardware solution to make that drain unnoticeable? And AMD didn't?
Done right, it could be more noticeable than 1ghz clock difference in practical real world use.