Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Aug 2010 14:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 437619
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Another Grumpy Old Guy
by fresch on Sat 21st Aug 2010 09:32
in reply to "Another Grumpy Old Guy"
Too bad, I can only vote you up.
Too bad, that common sense is thrown out when people get on the 'net.
And too bad, that clear headed, reasonable statements like yours have become a rarity on the 'net.
Again, you don't deserve just a "+1", your comment should actually be shown as ending statement of this article.




Member since:
2005-07-12
Somebody said their internet has never had ads and neither has mine. I block 'em all and let God sort them out.
Forget this notion that we have some obligation, moral or otherwise, to view ads. The content providers publish their content with ads. We did not ask for the content, and have no right to demand the content, it is published solely at the will of the publisher/creator.
We have the right to use our eyes, bandwidth and computer in any manner we choose. If we want to tape paper over the screen to keep from seeing parts of content provided by publishers/creators or use some more technical means, that is our right.
Once more, they get the choice to not publish or publish in any form they wish. We get the right to not view or view in any form we wish. Any of those choices of actions have consequences that must be borne by the party choosing the action.
I'm willing to deal with the potential consequences of my actions. But seriously, quit telling me, essentially, that by viewing content I have entered some quid pro quo arrangement with the provider that obligates me to look at ads. This is sheer fantasy.
And by the way, get the heck off my lawn.
Edited 2010-08-20 18:09 UTC