Linked by diegocg on Mon 23rd Aug 2010 14:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 437800
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: system D looks very promising
by tux68 on Mon 23rd Aug 2010 16:12
in reply to "RE: system D looks very promising"
launchd is supposed to do all this and has been open source for years.
You're right about that. They've said that launchd doesn't fit on Linux very well though, and that it isn't scalable enough. To quote the rather vague explanation:
launchd is a great invention, but I am not convinced that it would fit well into Linux, nor that it is suitable for a system like Linux with its immense scalability and flexibility to numerous purposes and uses.
which you can find in the FAQ section of : http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
RE[2]: system D looks very promising
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Mon 23rd Aug 2010 16:25
in reply to "RE: system D looks very promising"
I think the explanation for that would be similar to this guy's thinking:
http://lowendmac.com/ed/winston/10kw/launchd.html
RE[2]: system D looks very promising
by Rahul on Mon 23rd Aug 2010 18:19
in reply to "RE: system D looks very promising"
RE[2]: system D looks very promising
by uray on Mon 23rd Aug 2010 20:24
in reply to "RE: system D looks very promising"




Member since:
2005-11-10
I can't say I know the technical merits, but as I understand it launchd is supposed to do all this and has been open source for years. Isn't this sort of reinventing the wheel? It seems to me that if there is already a system out there for nix based systems to manage all this, shouldn't that be improved upon instead of creating something new? But it may be that these two do different things, I am not sure.