Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Aug 2010 18:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438004
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: In Defense of Windows 95
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 24th Aug 2010 20:03
in reply to "In Defense of Windows 95"
<blockquote>
It really took to 1999 for the standard PC to have enough horse power to support more enterprise level operating systems.</blockquote>
OS/2 Warp was definitely enterprise, definitely before windows 95, and definitely more stable.
Had it running fine on my 386 that was too slow for win 95.
RE[2]: In Defense of Windows 95
by dylansmrjones on Tue 24th Aug 2010 21:21
in reply to "RE: In Defense of Windows 95"





Member since:
2005-09-27
1. In terms of UI it was a major improvement of Windows 3.1
2. It ran faster then Linux with Xwindows on low memory systems.
3. It had a slew of hardware drivers.
4. Compatibility with Old DOS and WIndows 3.1 Apps.
5. Mac OS had its own problems that the Mac Fan Boy will never mention unless comparing it with a new version of the same OS
It really took to 1999 for the standard PC to have enough horse power to support more enterprise level operating systems. Windows 95 and 98 were really a gateway OS. That gave the common folk access to multi-tasking and networking.