Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Aug 2010 22:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438227
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-12
From the blog:
Choice is great. I am all for choice. If the NAB wants to privately facilitate the choice of having broacast receivers on cell phones, then they have my blessing.
However, if they intend to get government legislation enacted that makes it mandatory for cell phones to have broadcast receivers, then I will fiercly oppose the NAB. Such legislation would remove consumer choice and would use precious public funds and resorces that should go to something more worthwhile.
Edited 2010-08-25 23:24 UTC