Linked by Dennis Heuer on Wed 25th Aug 2010 22:23 UTC
Linux I came across a news entry at Phoronix about a new init replacement, systemd, and curiously started a read into the surprisingly heavy matter. Systemd is by no means as simple as upstart. It does far more things far more straight and in more detail. The differences are so significant that they enforce quite different configuration strategies. One can argue for both, depending on the goal to reach. However, that's not what I want to write about. After having read what systemd is capable of, and how it does it, I began to put the existence of all system daemons - in their today's forms - in question.
Thread beginning with comment 438413
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't mean to sound like a dick but...
by Icaria on Fri 27th Aug 2010 05:42 UTC
Member since:

This article proved incredibly difficult to read, as the English is more than a little mangled. I'm familiar with sysvinit, upstart and systemd but I gave up 1/2 way through paragraph 3, as I just had no idea what I was reading. Sorry.

Reply Score: 1