Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Aug 2010 23:47 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 438416
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Personal_Computer
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_64
Still think it was pre PC ?
I think you are trying to say what the graphs located here state more clearly:
http://jeremyreimer.com/postman/node/329
IBM PC + Clones dominated, although not a single model of them sold more than c64. Plus check out 1984's market share ( when my dad bought a c64)! It had 40% of the market!
Yeah, I would definitely consider buying an all in one. If it were cheap enough and came with a c64 mode and tv out.