Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Aug 2010 19:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438471
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I also think maybe the title is not correct. I think since Thom is understandably not a US citizen he didn't understand the nuance between FCC censorship on TV and the Internet. I don't see anything in 'thehill' article about the Internet.
Of course there's nothing in that article about the internet. All I use the article for is to illustrate just what kind of an organisation the FCC really is, i.e., one you don't want overseeing the internet.
RE[2]: Comment by jjmckay
by jjmckay on Fri 27th Aug 2010 21:39
in reply to "RE: Comment by jjmckay"
Of course there's nothing in that article about the internet. All I use the article for is to illustrate just what kind of an organisation the FCC really is, i.e., one you don't want overseeing the internet.
Oh, right! Yes I definitely don't want to see the FCC overseeing the Internet! Absolutely. That's a nightmare scenario as far as I'm concerned.
Edit: And yes, I think Net Neutrality would indeed open up a huge can of worms as far as FCC oversight on the Internet.
Edited 2010-08-27 21:41 UTC
RE[2]: Comment by jjmckay
by jjmckay on Fri 27th Aug 2010 22:04
in reply to "RE: Comment by jjmckay"
Of course there's nothing in that article about the internet. All I use the article for is to illustrate just what kind of an organisation the FCC really is, i.e., one you don't want overseeing the internet.
Tom sorry I thought the main newsbit of the headline was 'thehill' link in the blurb but after you replied I found your writeup. Great article and I agree, if that matters. Unfortunately, there has been a huge corporate PR campaign from Internet content providers such as Google who have been very successful in creating a lot of hysteria in support of Network Neutrality which likely would, as you point out, be administered by the FCC.
I've been doing what I can to keep the Internet free from FCC oversight and I also agree with the previous story here on OSNEWS that rightly pointed out that free and open competition is far more powerful to keep the Internet neutral. I believe that if we end the government-granted duopoly, we won't need FCC or government regulation to keep the Internet free because consumer choice is a very powerful force, more powerful than the FCC or Congress.
RE[2]: Comment by jjmckay
by MamiyaOtaru on Fri 27th Aug 2010 23:55
in reply to "RE: Comment by jjmckay"





Member since:
2005-11-11
I also think maybe the title is not correct. I think since Thom is understandably not a US citizen he didn't understand the nuance between FCC censorship on TV and the Internet. I don't see anything in 'thehill' article about the Internet or web.
Edited 2010-08-27 21:37 UTC