Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Aug 2010 22:11 UTC, submitted by lfeagan
Thread beginning with comment 438533
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, two big fixes; Amazon is left out too, and from the description in the article, it seems like this law suit should be all over them.
The article mentions that he's still a big MS shareholder, but only mentions that Amazon is based in his home town... does he show up on Amazon's list of major shareholders?
Selective enforcement of patents should make them invalid.




Member since:
2006-01-24
but to think that this is yet another Microsoft 'attack-by-proxy'. They are the one big fish left out of this lawsuit, the lawsuit is launched by a microsoft co-founder (through one of his companies). The good news is that these so called patents are so obvious that HOPEFULLY they will be disregarded or atleast manage to put a giant spotlight on how absurd the US patent system has become.