Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Aug 2010 22:11 UTC, submitted by lfeagan
Thread beginning with comment 438567
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-17
he's not genuinely borking himself.
if this lawsuit doesn't go well, he can "take it to the next level" by suing the patent office.
i know enough to have definite opinion, but the 3 items you have there (from arstechnica) look very vague, and/or "obvious".
maybe i can sue almost everyone who sells or profits from objects that can make marks on objects for the purposes of communication.
yeah! these fellows were the first infringers! http://images.google.com/images?q=cave-paintings