Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Aug 2010 22:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438712
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sure, Opera doesn't sport addon functionality, but otherwise it seems to have all the same functionality, including support for all the same CSS tricks and all and yet comparing Fennec to Opera is like comparing night to day. How come?
1. The extra layer of open-source goodness.
2. Opera keeps all of the bits in cold storage prior to release.
3. [truth] Opera has a boat-load of experience making mobile browsers [/truth]
1. The extra layer of open-source goodness.
2. Opera keeps all of the bits in cold storage prior to release.
3. [truth] Opera has a boat-load of experience making mobile browsers [/truth]
2. Opera keeps all of the bits in cold storage prior to release.
3. [truth] Opera has a boat-load of experience making mobile browsers [/truth]
4. Mozilla don't know how to make non-bloated software (though there has been BIG improvements in the last few years).
Edited 2010-08-31 20:47 UTC




Member since:
2006-02-15
The version of Fennec that comes with N900 is already terribly horribly slow, I can only imagine how slow an alpha build on an Android can be. I only have to wonder how the heck can it be so slow when Opera on the same hardware literally flies. Sure, Opera doesn't sport addon functionality, but otherwise it seems to have all the same functionality, including support for all the same CSS tricks and all and yet comparing Fennec to Opera is like comparing night to day. How come?