Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Aug 2010 22:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 438801
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: "not fighting" = not suing
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 31st Aug 2010 13:25
in reply to ""not fighting" = not suing"
Apple are under no obligation to make it easy to jailbreak their phones. They sold a product. You bought the product AS SOLD.
They will support and warranty this product as it was sold. If you take it upon yourself to change things via unsupported hacks. They wont Stop you, but they certainly wont help you if it goes wrong. Why should they?
They will support and warranty this product as it was sold. If you take it upon yourself to change things via unsupported hacks. They wont Stop you, but they certainly wont help you if it goes wrong. Why should they?
Another one who didn't read. Fantastic.
RE[2]: "not fighting" = not suing
by Adurbe on Tue 31st Aug 2010 18:27
in reply to "RE: "not fighting" = not suing"
i did read the article and am, tbh, confused at the assertion I did not. Anyway, will clarify.
Apple have apparently taken the logic that they are fixing holes. BUT they are well within their rights to sue people who are jailbreaking and breaching the terms of use of the product AS SOLD (as per my comment above)
Remember 'jailbreaking' is an umbrella term which is used for unlocking of carrier locks (legit), installing 3rd party os/addons (legitish) to outright software piracy (100% not legit)




Member since:
2005-07-06
Apple are under no obligation to make it easy to jailbreak their phones. They sold a product. You bought the product AS SOLD.
They will support and warranty this product as it was sold. If you take it upon yourself to change things via unsupported hacks. They wont Stop you, but they certainly wont help you if it goes wrong. Why should they?