Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Sep 2010 20:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 439147
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: What is your reply Thom?
by Adam S on Thu 2nd Sep 2010 13:06
in reply to "RE[4]: What is your reply Thom?"
RE[6]: What is your reply Thom?
by joshv on Thu 2nd Sep 2010 13:40
in reply to "RE[5]: What is your reply Thom?"
RE[5]: What is your reply Thom?
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 2nd Sep 2010 13:58
in reply to "RE[4]: What is your reply Thom?"
RE[6]: What is your reply Thom?
by joshv on Thu 2nd Sep 2010 14:56
in reply to "RE[5]: What is your reply Thom?"





Member since:
2006-03-18
Thom most certainly made some unsubstantiated and defamatory accusations. Does that mean he's wrong? No, he could be right. But even if he is right it's unprofessional to publish such accusations unless you have proof. I have no idea if what Thom did was legally classifiable as libel or slander, but it's not professional journalism.