Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Oct 2005 12:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 43920
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> it may be slower moving thsn ubuntu, but it has a
> different focus, stability, security.
Exactly. If I were setting up a server, I'd like to be able to just run a cron job to get security updates and just walk away for a few years until the security patches dry up. As long as security updates are ongoing, Debian's slow pace is a big plus.
On my desktop, however, I want the latest and greatest but I don't want SIDs instability. I don't mind upgrading every 6 months to 1 year, so Ubuntu's 6 month cycle of stabilized SID is ideal.






Member since:
2005-09-21
lol people get offended easily, debian isnt going anywhere no matter what people say, it may be slower moving thsn ubuntu, but it has a different focus, stability, security.
people like to ignore simple logic most of the time, keep the good work up on reporting the news thom, More people enjoy it than not.