Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Sep 2010 16:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 439660
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-07
I don't quite understand what is going on here. Are those alleged violators linking to original stories, or copying and pasting text to their own articles. Or, maybe, typing the articles published on paper into web pages ?
Is it allowed to link to original story ? If it is why would someone republish something that is already on-line ? Why not just linking to it ? Legal or not, republishing an existing article looks pretty pointless to me.... Why would someone want to do it, unless she or he wants to make it appear as his/her own original work ?