Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 7th Sep 2010 10:25 UTC
Multimedia, AV Every so often we publish here at OSNews articles about copyright, about the war of the "old media" establishment against everyone else. Many, myself included, have argued that the way to get out of this mess -- short of changing the law -- is to have more artists release their work under a Creative Commons license. However, after a few years it became obvious to me that CC would never be able to change the industry all by itself. Offering a Free license, and having 30,000 albums released under it, was still not enough. Until the Summer of 2009, that is. Update: Added audio samples.
Thread beginning with comment 439667
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

You could dual-license the photos - CC-BY-SA, and under a separate commercial license. If they don't abide by CC-BY-SA, then they're causing you a financial loss by not getting your commercial license, and therefore you can go for damages.

Reply Parent Score: 3

Eddyspeeder Member since:

Thanks, i didn't know CC is non-exclusive. Great to hear!

Reply Parent Score: 2