To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And here's an interesting scenario. Lots of threads in this story have ended with some variation of "you own the device but not the service". Personally, I think the Playstation market plain sucks, about the only aspect of PSN I use is the game hosting. So, would it be illegal for another company to provide an alternative to PSN? I'm sure the terms of service would say so, but ToS aren't laws, and if you aren't using their service, what do their terms matter?
Now here's the thing, if I own it then why am I not allowed to backup my game discs, load an alternative OS and hack away to my heart's content and share what I have done? If the device is mine then it's none of Sony's business what hackery I use to achieve these ends.
But since they don't want to let anyone do these things anymore then they must be selling a service and not a product, thus they can refund the cost of the console.





Member since:
2010-07-07
If I'm paying $300 I own it and can do with it whatever I like.
If it's a rental service as their actions imply then they have no business charging $300 just as a cable or satellite company doesn't make you buy the receiver outright. Thus I have no right to modify it.
They need to figure this shit out and do it fast.