Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Sep 2010 23:38 UTC
Legal EULAs, and whatever nonsense they may contain, are legally binding in the US. Have a great weekend!
Thread beginning with comment 440440
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: A few points
by google_ninja on Sat 11th Sep 2010 07:46 UTC in reply to "RE: A few points"
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

So basically, youre saying that putting up a bajillion pages of legalese with an ok button isn't enough to indicate that this is different then buying a sandwich.

How about more "intangible" software? Like paying for rememberthemilk.com or something like that. There is no physical anything changing hands, but you are still going to get that gigantic license agreement you have to agree with.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, just sort of curious where you draw the line.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: A few points
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 11th Sep 2010 08:16 in reply to "RE[2]: A few points"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

So basically, youre saying that putting up a bajillion pages of legalese with an ok button isn't enough to indicate that this is different then buying a sandwich.


Except... Said legalese and okay button are only presented AFTER the sale has already concluded, and as such, FAIL.

They claim they're selling a service - then be a man and act like you're selling a service. When I want a mobile phone contract - a service - I'm offered a contract to properly sign, including all the terms and conditions to look over.

When I take up an insurance - a service - I'm offered a contract to properly sign, including all the terms and conditions to look over.

When I rent a car - a service - I'm offered a contract to properly sign, including all the terms and conditions to look over.

And so on. And so forth. There is no reason why software licensers (I'm banning the term vendors) can't do the same. Sure, it would be problematic for online sales, but that's not my problem. Entering into a mobile phone contract online in The Netherlands requires you to print out the contract and send it in, signed and well. Software licensers should do the same.

Why do people want to create special exemptions for software licensors? Why are they held to different standards?

Edited 2010-09-11 08:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: A few points
by Soulbender on Sat 11th Sep 2010 09:15 in reply to "RE[2]: A few points"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

So basically, youre saying that putting up a bajillion pages of legalese with an ok button isn't enough to indicate that this is different then buying a sandwich.


Because it's not. There's no reason software need to be different. We already have copyright protection and existing laws that protect software as much as any other consumer product. The fact that the industry is doing their best to convince you and everyone else otherwise doesn't mean they're right.
And I dont for a moment buy the bullshit that "it's easier to copy". It's not like it's hard to copy CD's or videos or books etc these days but you don't see EULA's on those.

No, this is the industry trying to exploiting the lawmakers ignorance to further it's own agenda.

Like paying for rememberthemilk.com or something like that.


it's a membership. There are existing laws governing that too and it's entirely different from purchasing software.

Reply Parent Score: 3