Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Sep 2010 23:38 UTC
Legal EULAs, and whatever nonsense they may contain, are legally binding in the US. Have a great weekend!
Thread beginning with comment 440497
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
dylansmrjones
Member since:
2005-10-02

What "injustice" is this supposed to protect against?


Obviously the injustice is that the copyright holder isn't paid when the sold physical software container is resold by the new owner of said physical software container... and again and again and again. It is obvious that american megacorporations are treated unjustly when they can't force you to surrender your property and your rights to them.

Or something...

Reply Parent Score: 5

TheGZeus Member since:
2010-05-19

Indeed.
If someone re-mixed music I made, sold it, and tried to restrict further re-use of that derivative work, I'd be furious!
I would then call my lawyer, and invoke the justice system to bring them in line, and probably re-allocate their filthy lucre to X or some other software project.

I wouldn't have a problem with selling it, that's a right granted by the license I chose. It's the re-use that's also granted to 3rd parties.

Same with software I'm involved with. See the recent BusyBox case(s).

Ideas are licensed.
Copyleft only works because of how (arguably over-)strong copyright became after 1976.

Similar ideas apply to patents, but the patent system is borked atm.

Reply Parent Score: 1