Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 13:55 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Nokia might not be gaining a lot of mindshare in the smartphone world with its Symbian operating system, but fact of the matter is that Symbian is still the most popular smartphone operating system in the world - by a long shot. Today, Nokia officially unveiled three new smartphones that will run the latest iteration of the mobile platform, Symbian^3.
Thread beginning with comment 440921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Symbian
by darknexus on Tue 14th Sep 2010 16:25 UTC in reply to "Symbian"
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

I'm glad I'm not the only one who still likes Symbian. I'll say that some of the UI should be cleaned up, but Symbian can do pretty much everything and has to be one of the most power-efficient mobile oses around (very nice if you actually value battery life on your phone). It might not have a lot of bling, but that's just fine with me. I'll take functionality and performance over bling any day, and I've yet to see any current mobile os that can outdue Symbian for pure functionality and battery life.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Symbian
by mkools on Tue 14th Sep 2010 16:51 in reply to "RE: Symbian"
mkools Member since:
2005-10-11

I don't know about Symbian. I owned several Nokia phones where my latest was an N95 and I never liked Symbian, too messy and just not user friendly.

It's just too boring compared to all the other stuff in the market right now. Look at the video alone, the phone looks so old-fashion. And then he demonstrates multi-touch like we never seen that before come on.

The reason Symbian is the most used OS is because it is installed on $10 phones, not because it is so good so as long as Nokia keeps Symbian alive I'll keep running away from Nokia and buy something else.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Symbian
by Mellin on Tue 14th Sep 2010 21:47 in reply to "RE[2]: Symbian"
Mellin Member since:
2005-07-06

i think that windows mobile 6.5 is more boring than symbian

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Symbian
by Neolander on Tue 14th Sep 2010 17:21 in reply to "RE: Symbian"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

I'm glad I'm not the only one who still likes Symbian. I'll say that some of the UI should be cleaned up, but Symbian can do pretty much everything and has to be one of the most power-efficient mobile oses around (very nice if you actually value battery life on your phone). It might not have a lot of bling, but that's just fine with me. I'll take functionality and performance over bling any day, and I've yet to see any current mobile os that can outdue Symbian for pure functionality and battery life.

I like Symbian too, because it's both powerful and power-efficient.

About the "powerful" aspect, I think some might disagree, so let me explain this : as far as I know, there's still nothing like the Symbian home screen around in bling phones, as of today. It gets a while before you get used to it and fully master it, granted. But then, with a quick look, you know everything important going on in your phone in an effortless fashion. No need to open several apps, no need to scroll across multiple panes and fight visually repulsive and unreadable widgets with an inconsistent UI. No hassle. Customizable to fit everyone's need.

Symbian may not randomly generate fart noise and display the fluid simulation of said fart on screen simultaneously, with propagation delays taken into account, granted. But unlike most other smartphone OSs it gets the basic phone and PDA functionality right, and makes it a pleasure to work with most of the time. And for those who love complex and battery-sucking applications on a 2" screen, there's still some gems on the OVI store, like the Skype app.

Symbian is a balanced OS. It can be nearly as good as s40 as a phone OS, though it's a bit more complex, and it introduces nice smartphone functionalities as the icing on the cake. That's why I like it.

Edited 2010-09-14 17:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4